"pls follow the instruction before writing" Write essay by using CIRAC method C for conclusion I for issue R for rule A for analysis and C for conclusion in rule part must write Rule +constitutional Authority Statutory Authority +Long arm

A woman attended a corporation's sales presentation in state A. At this presentation, the corporation's salespeople spoke to prospective buyers about purchasing so called

'super solar panels" rooftop solar panels that the corporation 's salespeople said were 100 times as efficient as traditional solar panels. The salespeople said were100 times as efficient as traditional solar panels. The salespeople distributed brochures that purported to show that the solar panels. Had performed successfully in multiple rigorous test. The brochures had been prepared by an independent engineer pursuant to a consulting contract with the corporation.

Based on what she was told at this presentation and the brochure she receive, the woman decided to purchase solar panels from the corporation for $20,000.The corporation shippedthe panels to the woman from its manufacturing facility in state B. The woman had the panels installed on theroof of her house in state A. The panels failed to work as promised, even though they were properly installed.

A federal statute prohibits " material misstatements or omissions of fact in connection with the sale or purchase of solar panels" and provides an exclusive civil remedy for individuals harmed by such statements. This remedy preempts all state law claims that would otherwise apply to this purchase.

Relying on the federal statute the woman has sued the corporation and the independent engineer in the U.S District court for the district of state A. She alleges that the statements made by the engineer on the brochure and the statements made by the corporation 's salespeople at the presentation were false and misleading with respect to the solar panels' performance and value, she seeks damages of 30,000(the cost of the solar panels the expense of installing them).

The woman is a state A resident The corporation is incorporated in state Band has its principal place of business in state B. He knew that the brochures would be distributed to prospective buyers at sales presentations around the country.

The federal statute has no provision on personal jurisdiction. State A's long arm statute has been interpreted to extend personal jurisdiction as far as the U.S Constitution allows.

The engineer has timely moved to dismiss the complaint against him for lack of subject and personal jurisdiction. The engineer has also filed an answer (subject to his motion to dismiss)denying the claims against him asserting a cross claim against the corporation. The engineer 's cross claim alleges that the corporation must indemnify the engineer for any damages he may have to pay the woman. The indemnity claim is based on the terms of the consulting contract between the corporation and the engineer.

The corporation has filed timely motions to dismiss the woman's complaint for lack of subject matter and personal jurisdiction and to dismiss the engineer's cross for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

1 Does the state a federal district court have personal jurisdiction over

.

1:Assuming that there is personal jurisdiction over both defendants, does the state A Federal district court have subject matter jurisdiction over.

1. The women's claim against the corporation and the engineer? Explain
2. The engineer 's cross claim against the corporation? Explain.
3. question is now asked just about subject matter jurisdiction