Police Officers commonly seize and search computers in connection with criminal investigations.Computer searches are different from ordinary searches for physical evidenceand usually requires a forensicexpert to do the search.

A. It is well established that the Police must complete the search within 7 days.

B. Police have 30 days from the date of seizure.

C. Currently there are no clear rules governing the amount of time the Police may retain seized property.

D. Courts have ruled that more than one year is unreasonable.

10 Bob had his computer and digital camera seized under a valid warrant on January 1, 2015 seeking to prove that Bob had committed fraud. Bob pled guilty on January 15, 2016.On February 1, 2016 the forensic expert found illegal child pornography on both the computer and digital camera.Bob argued that the police had taken too long and the warrant was no longer valid since he had pled guilty to the fraud case.

Question 10 options:

The warrant was still valid and the evidence of child pornographyis admissible.

The warrant was issued for fraudulent information so is not valid.

Since the child pornography was found after the guilty plea it can not be used against Bob.

The cause of the warrant issue had been diminshed and therefore the incriminating information can not be used.

11 Digital evidence includes

Question 11 options:

Social media sites

Smart phones

Computer

All of the above

Question 12

Evidence that can be found on a computer include

Question 12 options:

Search history

Temporary files and cookies

deleted files

all of the above

Warrantless searches can be carried out in the following circumstances

Question 13 options:

Examiners convenience and time limitations

Permission anddanger of immediate destruction of evidence

Lead officer review and permission and exigent circumstances.

None of the above

Question 14(1 point)

In 2014 Riley v California the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that warrantless search and seizure of digital contents of a cell phone made during the course of an arrest

Question 14 options:

Are constitutional

Are unconstitutional

Are constitutional only if the phone is being used by the criminal atthe time of the arrest.

Constitutional if the phone is on the person at the time of the arrest.