Post answers to the two questions below. State whether you believe that the textualist or purposivist approach to interpreting statutes is preferable and give your reason(s) for your preference. Identify one recognized canon of construction - either linguistic or substantive -- that you believe to be unwise or of little utility. Explain why you so believe. (In the unlikely event that you believe they're all good, discuss the limitations of the one you believe to be least helpful.)