Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Potential expert witnesses made an oral agreement with a plaintiff's attorney to testify on behalf of the plaintiff for $60,000.However, after receiving the money, the

Potential expert witnesses made an oral agreement with a plaintiff's attorney to testify on behalf of the plaintiff for $60,000.However, after receiving the money, the witnesses backed out of the agreement and said they would not testify in court or pay back the money.The witnesses claimed that the plaintiff could not sue them because their oral contract was with the attorney and not the plaintiff.Yet the plaintiff claimed she could sue because she was a third-party beneficiary to the contract.The court made a landmark decision regarding expert witnesses and third-party beneficiary case law.What was the rationale for such a surprising decision? [Isbell v. Friedman,U.S. App. No. 11-2113.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Fundamentals Of Law For Health Informatics And Information Management

Authors: Melanie Brodnik, LaurieRinehart-Thompson, Rebecca Reynolds

3rd Edition

9781584265306

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Present main arguments for and against the computer metaphor.

Answered: 1 week ago