Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Power plants in the United States emit a variety of pollutants while producing valuable electricity. Two power plants close to Greensboro are the Belews Creek

Power plants in the United States emit a variety of pollutants while producing valuable electricity.

Two power plants close to Greensboro are the Belews Creek and Dan River power plants.The Belews Creek plant has almost 2,500 MW of capacity and generated 7.1 billion kWh of electricity in 2019.To produce this electricity, it emitted 6.8 million tons of CO2 and 5,668 tons of NOX as well as other pollutants.

The Dan River plant has about 1000 MW of capacity and generated 4.4 billion kWh of electricity in 2019.To produce this electricity, it emitted 1.8 million tons of CO2 and 267 tons of NOX as well as other pollutants.

It is costly to abate emissions of CO2 from each power plant.For CO2, suppose the marginal abatement cost at Belews Creek is MCb= 200Xb and at Dan River is MCd=400Xd where marginal abatement costs are in $ per ton and Xbis abatement at Belews Creek in millions of tons and Xd is abatement at Dan River in millions of tons.

Suppose the regulator (US EPA and/or NC DEQ) wishes to reduce CO2 from the two power plants by 0.6 million tons, so they want 0.6 million tons of total abatement.

1)Cost effectiveness

a.Suppose the regulator decides to be fair and require 0.3 million tons of CO2 abatement from each power plant.

i.Is this cost effective?Explain your calculations.

ii.Which plant should abate more?Which plant should abate less?

b.Suppose the regulator decides to share the burden proportionally based on capacity.Because Belews Creek it bigger, it requires 0.5 million tons of abatement from Belews Creek and only 0.1 million tons of abatement from Dan River.

i.Is this cost effective?Explain your calculations.

ii.Which plant should abate more?Which plant should abate less?

c.Calculate the cost-effective abatement for each plant. Explain your calculations.

i.Hint: The equimarginal rule gives one equation.Another equation is because abatement must sum to 0.6 million. Then solve for two equations in two unknowns.Check your algebra with wolframalpha.com.

d.Illustrate your answers with a graph. Be sure to label as many points as possible.

i.Hint: The width of your diagram will be 0.6.

2)Emissions tax

a.Suppose the regulator decides to regulate CO2 emissions with a tax of $80 per ton.

i.How much will Belews Creek abate?Explain your calculations.

ii.How much will Dan River abate? Explain your calculations.

iii.Is the emissions tax cost effective?Explain your calculations.

3)Emissions trading

a.Suppose the regulator decides to regulate CO2 emissions with emissions trading and allocates permits so that each plant is required to abate 0.3 million tons.

i.Is this allocation cost effective?If not, explain who would like to pollute more (and buy permits) and who would like to abate more (and sell permits).

Pollution Hotspots

Suppose the regulator also wishes to reduce NOx emissions.NOX emissions are not uniformly mixed.Because Belews Creek is not near a population center, the damages from emissions at Belews Creek are $11,000 per ton of NOX emissions.Because Dan River is near population centers in Eden, NC and Danville, VA, the damages from emissions at Dan River are higher at $13,000 per ton of NOX emissions.

It is costly to abate emissions of NOX from each power plant.Suppose the marginal abatement cost of NOX emissions at Belews Creek is MCb=80X and at Dan River is MCd=100Xd where marginal abatement costs are in $ per ton and XB is abatement at Belews Creek in tons and Xdis abatement at Dan River in tons.

4)Uniform emissions tax

a.Suppose the regulator charges a uniform emissions tax of $12,000 per ton to both power plants.

i.How much does each plant abate? Explain your calculations.

ii.Is the result cost effective?

iii.Does the high damage plant (Dan River) abate more?Explain why or why not.

iv.Does the uniform emissions tax cause a pollution hotspot?Explain why or why not.

b.Suppose the regulator wishes to avoid a pollution hotspot and charges an emissions tax of $11,000 per ton at Belews Creek and $13,000 per ton at Dan River.

i.How much does each plant abate? Explain your calculations.

ii.Is the result cost effective?

iii.Does the high damage plant (Dan River) abate more?Explain why or why not.

iv.Does the differentiated emissions tax eliminate the pollution hotspot?Explain why or why not.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Moral Controversies In American Politics

Authors: Raymond Tatalovich, Warren Tatalovich

4th Edition

1317464427, 9781317464426

More Books

Students also viewed these Economics questions

Question

What factors decide whether a business idea is commercially viable?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

What opportunities exist for raises and advancement?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Values: What is important to me?

Answered: 1 week ago