PowerPoint presentation with voiceover that you will use in your oral presentation and will serve as the basis of your written research paper (see a-d below). Quality of this component is represented as "Content" on the applicable rubric.

Topic is the fallacy of Denying the Antecedent

1. Detailed explanation and analysis of fallacy
   • Here, you should not only define the fallacy that you chose, but also describe/define any other instances of it.
   • Identify any other names or terms that might be used for your chosen fallacy.
   • Indicate whether your chosen fallacy can be defined in multiple ways (and be sure to provide these definitions).
   • Your goal here is to offer the reader a thorough and authoritative analysis of the fallacy that you chose.

1. The fallacy as seen in your professional life as a kitchen manager in a restaurant.
   • Here, you will examine and outline the consequences of the fallacy and of faulty argumentation in general and in the workplace.
   • Explain at least one way that you can anticipate encountering your chosen fallacy in your professional life.
     1. Here, you should summarize your potential career path, ways that you can imagine the fallacy arising, and how the problems that come with the fallacy might be avoided.
     2. Thinking about your professional life and career path: has the fallacy arisen in the past? If so, when? How did you approach it? What were the results? Was there anything that you could have/should have done differently?
     3. In short, explain why it is important that your fallacy is identified and avoided.

1. Ways that the fallacy disrupts argumentation:
   • Based on your findings in the previous section, outline the various ways that your chosen fallacy can disrupt argumentation and/or one's critical thinking ability.

1. Means to lessen problems arising from fallacy:
   • Based on your findings, evaluate some of the best practices to avoid this fallacy. When the fallacy is encountered, what should be done?