Prepare a posting that answers the following in relation to the Keith v. County of Oakland case. (Please include "Keith" in a title at the beginning of your posting!)

• • • 1. Does it appear that the type of "individualized inquiry" required by the ADA occurred in this case? Why or why not?
    • 2. Was the plaintiff "otherwise qualified" for this life guard position? Why or why not?
    • 3. What accommodations was the plaintiff requesting? Are they reasonable or would they likely impose an undue hardship? Explain.
    • 4. What did the county do well in this case? What things should it have done differently?