Prepare income statements under both variable and absorption costing for two consecutive years; compare and explain key differences.

Adrena was in her first year of work at an accounting services firm after earning her degree. She had become very comfortable preparing financial statements for many different companies that used standard costing within their absorption costing systems. Her supervisor came to her with a slightly different assignment today, though: One of their clients needed its standard, absorption costing income statements prepared, as usual, but the client also requested the same-period financial statements be presented under variable costing. Adrena's supervisor explained that it had something to do with a different benchmark from which they might award bonuses to their employees. Adrena was intrigued, because she didn't remember off the top of her head if these two income statement formats would generate the same income or not.

She gathered the following information in preparation for her work, noting there were no price, efficiency, or spending variances in either year. If there was a Fixed-MOH volume variance, company policy was to write it off directly to cost of goods sold:

Budgeted selling price 50 per unit Budgeted variable operating expense 5 per unit Budgeted variable manufacturing cost 24 per unit Budgeted fixed manufacturing cost 360,000 Budgeted fixed operating expense 465,000 Budgeted production 60,000 units Year 1 Year 2 Beginning inventory 2,000 units Actual production 56,000 60,000 units Sales volume 54,000 61,000 units