Presume digital devices capable of storing electronic data containing child pornography are listed as objects to search for and seize in a federal search warrant directed at someone's home in Norfolk, VA$.$ There is no mention of illegal drugs, such as cocaine, in the warrant $.$ Now suppose, pursuant to this search warrant, an FBI agent lawfully opens a dresser drawer in the home and sees a package in which it is immediately apparent that it contains cocaine. If the FBI agent seizes the cocaine:

the cocaine will not be admissible as evidence in a criminal trial because the FBI agent lacked probable cause to open the dresser drawer.

It depends as to whether the agent had received permission from the federal prosecutor $($AUSA$)$ to open the drawer.

the cocaine will be not be admissible as evidence in a criminal trial because this was an unlawful search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment.

the cocaine will be admissible as evidence in a criminal trial under the plain view doctrine.