Previous Page Next Page Page 2 of 2 Question 6 (1 point) Saved In the CANLII case study, the employer appealed the Ministry of Labour's orders based on: workplace heat and temperature are not explicitly addressed in the Occupational Health and Safety Act. O they preferred the scope of the assessment to include the entire workplace, not just the two specified work areas. O they preferred to have an Ergonomist conduct the assessment, not an Occupational Hygienist as specified in the order. they challenged the Inspector's power or authority to order them to have an expert conduct a heat stress assessment. a and d are correct