Question
Prime Electronics, a division of Batton Corporation, manufactures two large-screen television models: the Mammoth, which has been produced since 2013 and sells for $967, and
Prime Electronics, a division of Batton Corporation, manufactures two large-screen television models: the Mammoth, which has been produced since 2013 and sells for $967, and the Maximum, a newer model introduced in early 2015 that sells for $1,315.
LOADING...
(Click the icon to view additional information.)
Based on the following income statement for the year ended November 30, 2017, senior management at Batton have decided to concentrate Prime's marketing resources on the Maximum model and to begin to phase out the Mammoth model because Maximum generates a much bigger operating income per unit.
Prime Electronics | |||
Income Statement for the | |||
Fiscal Year Ended November 30, 2017 | |||
| Mammoth | Maximum | Total |
Revenues | $22,241,000 | $5,260,000 | $27,501,000 |
Cost of goods sold | 14,462,400 | 3,523,600 | 17,986,000 |
Gross margin | 7,778,600 | 1,736,400 | 9,515,000 |
Selling and administrative expense | 5,560,250 | 1,052,000 | 6,612,250 |
Operating income | $2,218,350 | $684,400 | $2,902,750 |
Units produced and sold | 23,000 | 4,000 |
|
Operating income per unit sold | $96.45 | $171.10 |
|
Details for cost of goods sold for Mammoth and Maximum are as follows:
| Mammoth | Maximum | |||
|
| Total | Per Unit | Total | Per Unit |
Direct materials | $5,257,800 | $228.60 | $2,569,200 | $642.30 | |
Direct manufacturing labor | (a) | 483,000 | 21.00 | 196,000 | 49.00 |
Machine costs | (b) | 3,661,600 | 159.20 | 318,400 | 79.60 |
Total direct costs | $9,402,400 | $408.80 | $3,083,600 | $770.90 | |
Manufacturing overhead costs | (c) | 5,060,000 | 220.00 | 440,000 | 110.00 |
Total cost of goods sold | $14,462,400 | $628.80 | $3,523,600 | $880.90 |
(a)Mammoth requires 1.5 hours per unit and Maximum requires 3.5 hours per unit. The direct manufacturing labor cost is $14.00 per hour.
(b) Machine costs include lease costs of the machine, repairs, and maintenance. Mammoth requires 8 machine-hours per unit and Maximum requires 4 machine-hours per unit. The machine-hour rate is $19.90 per hour.
(c) Manufacturing overhead costs are allocated to products based on machine-hours at the rate of $27.50 per hour.
Prime's controller, Sonny Jacobi, is advocating the use of activity-based costing and activity-based management and has gathered information about the company's manufacturing overhead costs for the year ended November 30, 2017. After completing his analysis, Jacobi shows the results to Charlie Campo, the Prime division president.
|
| Units of the Cost-Allocation Base | ||
Activity Center (Cost-Allocation Base) | Total Activity Costs | Mammoth | Maximum | Total |
Soldering (number of solder points) | $1,113,000 | 1,140,000 | 450,000 | 1,590,000 |
Shipments (number of shipments) | 1,001,000 | 16,300 | 5,700 | 22,000 |
Quality control (number of inspections) | 1,348,500 | 51,300 | 26,200 | 77,500 |
Purchase orders (number of orders) | 951,000 | 80,500 | 109,700 | 190,200 |
Machine power (machine-hours) | 48,000 | 175,600 | 16,400 | 192,000 |
Machine setups (number of setups) | 1,038,500 | 16,600 | 14,400 | 31,000 |
Total manufacturing overhead | $5,500,000 |
|
|
|
PrintDone
Campo does not like what he sees. "If you show headquarters this analysis, they are going to ask us to phase out the Maximum line, which we have just introduced. This whole costing stuff has been a major problem for us. First Mammoth was not profitable and now Maximum.
"Looking at the ABC analysis, I see two problems. First, we do many more activities than the ones you have listed. If you had included all activities, maybe your conclusions would be different. Second, you used number of setups and number of inspections as allocation bases. The numbers would be different had you used setup-hours and inspection-hours instead. I know that measurement problems precluded you from using these other cost-allocation bases, but I believe you ought to make some adjustments to our current numbers to compensate for these issues. I know you can do better. We can't afford to phase out either product." Jacobi knows that his numbers are fairly accurate. As a quick check, he calculates the profitability of Maximum and Mammoth using more and different allocation bases. The set of activities and activity rates he had used results in numbers that closely approximate those based on more detailed analyses. He is confident that headquarters, knowing that Maximum was introduced only recently, will not ask Prime to phase it out. He is also aware that a sizable portion of Campo's bonus is based on division revenues. Phasing out either product would adversely affect his bonus. Still, he feels some pressure from Campo to do something.
PrintDone
Requirements
1.Using activity-based costing, calculate the gross margin per unit of the Maximum and Mammoth models.
2.Explain briefly why these numbers differ from the gross margin per unit of the Maximum and Mammoth models calculated using Prime's existing simple costing system.
3.Comment on Campo's concerns about the accuracy and limitations of ABC.
4.How might Prime find the ABC information helpful in managing its business?
5.What should Sonny Jacobi do in response to Campo's comments?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started