Prime Investments Corporation sues one if its executives, Stewart, for embezzling client funds. At trial, Prime calls several of Stewart's colleagues to the stand, who testify that Stewart is a bad person with no

integrity and they were not surprised to hear that he was accused of stealing money. Typically opinions of this type are not admissible in court. The jury finds Stewart liable to Prime for $1 million in stolen

money. If Stewart appeals, the appellate court will probably

a. Affirm the decision, because it will accept the trial court's factual findings.

b. Reverse the decision due to the trial judge's legal error.

c. Affirm the decision, because it will accept the trial court's legal ruling.

d. Refuse to hear the appeal because judges have the right to admit any testimony they want