Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Prior to the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002(SOX), auditing companies had engaged in non-auditing functions with the corporations they audited. Although this had been cause for concern

Prior to the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002("SOX"), auditing companies had engaged in non-auditing functions with the corporations they audited. Although this had been cause for concern by the SEC, rules were not promulgated until mandated by Sarbanes-Oxley. Now, auditing companies are forbidden to perform non-auditing services simultaneously with auditing services. Auditing companies must now contract with the audit committee of the corporation they propose to audit, rather than with the management of the corporation, as had been the practice before. SOXalso made the audit committee directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of any work done by the auditors. Do you think this will change the nature of how an audit is done? Do you think it will prevent the auditors from engaging in practices that could undermine the intent of SOX? Do you think the added layer of requiring the CEO and CFO to certify the work of the auditing committee helps to bring back the balance that was lost by commingling accounting practices and auditing practices?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Civil Procedure

Authors: Stephen C. Yeazell, Joanna C. Schwartz

10th Edition

1454897880, 978-1454897880

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Always have the dignity of the other or others as a backdrop.

Answered: 1 week ago