Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Prioritizing Infrastructure Maintenance: The government could have prioritized the allocation of funds towards infrastructure maintenance. This would have ensured that there were sufficient funds for
Prioritizing Infrastructure Maintenance: The government could have prioritized the allocation of funds towards infrastructure maintenance. This would have ensured that there were sufficient funds for the repair and replacement of the bridge. This could have been achieved by conducting a thorough cost-benefit analysis to understand the potential risks and costs associated with a bridge collapse versus the costs of repair and maintenance. Efficient Budget Management: The funds allocated for infrastructure development and maintenance should have been used judiciously. Misuse or misallocation of funds can lead to resource shortages for critical projects like bridge maintenance. Therefore, efficient budget management and oversight could have prevented this issue. Regular and Detailed Inspections: Despite the high costs, regular and detailed inspections of the bridge could have been prioritized in the budget. These inspections could have identified the design errors and worsening state of the bridge, allowing for timely intervention. Can you help me rewrite simpler
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started