Problem 1 A partnership was formed orally though more than P500 was contributed in cash. Now then, under the last paragraph of Art. 1358, contracts "where the amount involved exceeds P500 [such contract] must appear in writing, even a private one." Should the oral partnership formed be considered valid? (Art. 1357, Civil Code; see also Thunga Chui v. Que Bentec, 2 Phil. 661; see also Magalona v. Pesayco, 59 Phil. 453). Problem 2 Magalona v. Pesayco 59 Phil. 453 FACTS: Pesayco, a partner in an oral partnership for the catching of fish, with cash as the only contributions thereto refused to account for proceeds of the firm on the ground that the agreement was not in writing. Is he correct? PROBLEM 3. Facts: X and Y entered into a universal partnership of all present property. In the contract, there was no stipulation regarding other properties. Subsequently, X received a parcel of land by inheritance from his father; and another parcel of land from Alpha Corporation as remuneration for X's work as Controller therein. Question 1: Are the two parcels of land and their fruits to be enjoyed by the partnership? Question 2: Same facts, except that in the contract, it was stipulated that all properties subsequently acquired would belong to the partnership. Are the two parcels of land and their fruits to be enjoyed by the partnership