Problem 4 In 1988, US cattle producers voted on whether or not to each pay a dollar per head towards the marketing campaigns of the American Beef Council. At the time of this vote, the council's TV campaign featured a voice-over by actor Robert Mitchum, using the theme "Beef it's what's for dinner.\" [see https://www.youtube.corn/watch?v=CN_86_PijY] To understand the vote results (it passed), the Montana state cattlemen's association looked at the effect of the physical size of the farm and the value of the farms' gross revenue on voter preference. The data (in the le beef.csv on the usual website) consist of the vote results (%yes), average size of farm (hundreds of acres), and average value of products sold annually by each farm (in $ thousands) for each of Montana's 56 counties. mydata=read . csv("http: //www.datadescant.com/stat1G4/beef. csv") a) Fit a regression model for YES with SIZE as a covariates. Interpret the results. What regression assumptions might we have violated here? Hintlook at the residual diagnostic plot. b) Does logging the response variable work in this problem? How can you tell