Problem 7-16 Comparing Traditional and Activity-Based Product Margins [LO7-1, LO7-3, LO7-4, LO7-5] Hi-Tek Manufacturing, Inc., makes two types of industrial component parts-the B300 and the T500. An absorption costing income statement for the most recent period is shown Hi-Tek Manufacturing Inc. Income Statement Sales Cost of goods sold Gross margin Selling and administrative expenses Net operating loss s 1,701,200 1,247,755 453,445 560,000 $ (106,555) Hi-Tek produced and sold 60,100 units of B300 at a price of $20 per unit and 12,800 units of T500 at a price of $39 per unit. The company's traditional cost system allocates manufacturing overhead to products using a plantwide overhead rate and direct labor dollars as the allocation base. Additional information relating to the company's two product lines is shown below: B300 T500 Total Direct materials Direct labor Manufacturing overhead Cost of goods sold $ 401,000 162,100$ 563,100 163,600 521,05!5 1,247,755 $ 120,800 42,800 The company has created an activity-based costing system to evaluate the profitability of its products. Hi-Tek's ABC implementation team concluded that $55,000 and $102,000 of the company's advertising expenses could be directly traced to B300 and T500 respectively. The remainder of the selling and administrative expenses was organization-sustaining in nature. The ABC team also distributed the company's manufacturing overhead to four activities as shown below: Activit T500 Activity Cost Pool (and Activity Measure) Machining (machine-hours) Setups (setup hours) Product-sustaining (number of products) Other (organization-sustaining costs) Total manufacturing overhead cost Manufacturing Overhead s 210,295 150,060 100,000 B300 Total 90,500 63,000 153,500 366 76 290 60,700 NA NA NA $ 521,055