[Problem deals with comparing NPVs of investment projects with unequal lives. The managers of Tinley Park Tin Plating Inc. wait to create a new type of acrylicsheet The firm anticipates strong demand over the next 14 years and it can meet the demand with either of two methods (projects supported by different types of manufacturing equipment. The two projects would be equally risky, such that the annual weighted average cost of capital (WAC) for the project would be 92 Propea A has a 14 year opected life and Net Present Value of 18.800.000. Project has a 7year expected life and NPV of 55.900.000 Because demand should continue throughout the next 14 years, the company managers would expect to repeat Project Bonce over years to 141,9 chosen to assumed that the NPV for a repention of Project B would also be 35.000.000 at the future date when it is repeated efficiency in should offset any initionary effects just as we umed in the examples we worked. Based on the replacement chain method of analysis. What are the two relevant tott PVures to come! ASSO,000.00 for Project A and 39,086,350/47 for project 511,966,6445 for Project A and 57.620.011.5 for Project CO for Project A and 3.200,000.00 Tor Project 0.8.800,000.00 for Project A and 110.000.00 for Projects E511.366.6445 for Project And 59.086 350.47 for Project