Professor K teaches an accounting course at PCC. According to PCC rule, the accounting course has a mandatory attendance requirement. In order to encourage attendance, Professor K offers the students extra credits for attending the class. The entire class had perfect attendance for the course. However, at the end of the course, Professor K did not actually give anyone the extra credits she had promised. The entire class sues Professor K for breach of contract. If you were to defend Professor K in court, what would be the best legal argument to make? (Hint: review the four elements of a legally valid contract and think about which element may be missing) Instruction: please use the IRAC method when answering the question. IRAC stands for Issue, Rule, Application and Conclusion. In other words, first you should summarize the relevant facts, and state the legal issue/question of this case, then talk about what the relevant legal rule and principle is for this case; lastly, you should apply the legal rule/principle to the facts of this case to reach a legal conclusion. The answer does not necessarily have to be long, but it should include all four elements of IRAC.