Project: 2032 Brisbane Olympic Games

RMIT School of Property, Construction and UNIVERSITY Project Management BUSM3307 PM Concepts Case Study Brief - 2032 Brisbane Olympic Games Key Project Information Project name: 2032 Brisbane Olympic Games Client: Brisbane 2032 Olympic Organising Committee Start date: 1 January 2025 . . Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia Budget: AUD $35 billion Timeframe: 7 years Project Background On 21 July 2021 and at a ceremony in Tokyo, the IOC (International Olympic Committee) officially announced Brisbane as the third Australian city (after Melbourne and Sydney) to host the 2032 Summer Olympics and Paralympics games. Brisbane Opening Ceremony is now set for 23 July 2032 and will be held at The Gabba Stadium at the heart of Brisbane CBD. The scope of the work is all the construction and infrastructure projects have to be completed prior to hosting the events such as building new stadiums and venues, improving existing sport facilities and complex, construction of a brand-new Olympic village and improving the Brisbane roads and other infrastructure to host this massive global event. In this case, you should not only focus on the construction aspects of the project. You also need to look at the cultural, social, political and environmental factors contributing on this project.Risk Register - 2032 Brisbane Olympic Games Project Name: 2032 Brisbane Olympic Games Project Manager Name: Antoinette Niakolas Document Name/Date: Risk Register - 01/02/25 Client/Sponsor Name: Brisbane 2032 Olympic Organising Committee Risk Description & Impact Likelihood Impact Rating Mitigation Measures Responsibility Cost Timeline of risk WBS on Project Natural Risk Possible Major High Add contingency costs to Brisbane 2032 $500,000 Implementation 1.1 Unforeseen weather conditions (4) (4) [16) budget to cater for Olympic to $1 Closing 2.1 (Heavy Rainfall/Thunder), unforeseen weather Organising billion 2.2 damaging areas of construction conditions. committee 3.2 and making workers unable to Allocating additional time (Client) 4.1 work. This risk can delay the to sub-deliverables to project time depending on the reduce delay in activity Antoinette 4.2 completion. 4.3 severity of damage. Niakolas Educate stakeholders & Additionally, can add additional contractors of warning [Project costs to repair damaged areas. signs & always be Manager) prepared. Contractors Health and Safety Risk Unlikely Major Medium To reduce the likelihood Antoinette $500,000 Planning 1.0 * *Safety during (2) (4) (8) of health and safety risks Niakolas Implementation 2.0 construction* * during construction, (Project Closing 3.2 engage in communication Manager) 4.0 of correct health & safety procedures to contractor. OH&S Manager Ensuring every contractor 3 labourer has the correct equipment (PPE) and stays alert on site Managerial Risk Likely Moderate Medium Regularly checking up Antoinette S Planning 1.0 Stakeholders dropping out of (3) (3] (9) with stakeholders (via Niakolas Implementation 2.0 tasks/projects (e.g., personal phone calls, email) and [Project Closing 3.0 reasons, incapability, no ensure they are engaged Manager) 4.0 reason) which can easily affect from the start of the project, so they become the duration of the project due supportive or neutral. to searching for replacements which sets back the project