Project Evaluation Criteria Activity Group into the Rubric Activity teams. After reviewing the project writing assignment rubric for this course, as a team, create guidance and examples needed to achieve or differentiate the criteria between Exceeds Standards and Meets Standards outcomes for the "This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehension", "This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication", "Analysis", and "Style and Mechanics". For reference: Comprehension (25%) to a Learning Outcome This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper should contain well-supported argument based on relevant concepts and theories, providing new ideas to the applicable discipline. Argument should be logical and use examples, evidence, research, and/or data from course content and from valid, external information sources. ) This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application (25% Decisions and conclusions should be a result of analysis and synthesis of evidence. Should formulate resolution and recommendations and may contribute to improvements in the applicable discipline. Conclusion could include possible consequences and outcome scenarios. Analysis (25%) Paper should provide comprehensive identification and analysis of issues in the realm of applicable discipline. Should design a course of action to solve the proposed research problem using multi-disciplinary principles, if appropriate. The evidence should come from valid sources. References should be complete and reflect appropriate sources. Style and Mechanics (25%) Mechanics of style should enhance content understanding, and writing skillfully supports the message and is in required.