Question
1: Are the amendments in this proposed Update operable? Why or why not? Question 2: Should a lessor be required to classify and account for
1: Are the amendments in this proposed Update operable? Why or why not?
Question 2: Should a lessor be required to classify and account for a sales-type lease with predominantly variable lease payments that do not depend on a reference index or a rate as an operating lease? Why or why not?
Question 3: Should “predominant” be the threshold for determining when a lessor should classify a lease with variable payments that do not depend on a reference index or a rate as an operating lease? Alternatively, would another threshold be more appropriate and operable (for example, “substantially all”)? Please provide your rationale.
Question 4: Would the proposed amendments provide improved decision-useful information for users of financial statements? Why or why not?
Step by Step Solution
3.45 Rating (155 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Answer 1 The suggested guidance for salestype leases with variable lease payments is in our opinion workable We acknowledge that in order to decide which payments in the contract would be allocated to ...Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started