Provide a summary and analysis of "Special Issue: Health Law With Disabilities on Canadian Jurisprudence: the Case of Leobrera v. Canada" by Ravi Malhotra (available in the Assignment 2 Folder on Brightspace) and discuss how the article fits in the broader literature concerning immigration/refugees. Your summary and analysis should include ALL parts below and address ALL questions asked. Use the major headings of the parts below in your essay.

Part I: Introduction (1 Mark) an introduction to the "Special Issue: Health Law With Disabilities on Canadian Jurisprudence: the Case of Leobrera v. Canada" by Ravi Malhotra that includes the following information: Introduce the article you will be analyzing in the assignment. Be sure to provide the name of the author, the name of the article, and the year the article was published. At the time of writing this article, is the author an academic? (Note: This section does not require a citation) Note that your first footnote should provide a correct citation for the article

Part II: The Author's Research Project (3 Marks) Describe the framework for the author's research project by providing the information to answer the following questions: What central research question does the author deal with in the article? What research methods does the author use to gather information for the article? (i.e., what types of evidence do they rely upon?) How does the author structure the article (i.e. what major topics did the article cover)? Part III: Summary of the Article (12 Marks)

an analysis of the article. Be sure to answer each of the following questions: What is the author's thesis? (2 Marks) Summarize the author's main arguments on the legislative and jurisprudential history of disability-based exclusion in Canada. (4 Marks) Summarize the author's main arguments on the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its value as a potential legal tool. (3 Marks) The author states that that the Federal Court's opinion in Leobrera was ironic. What does the author mean by this? (3 Marks)

a concise annotation that: (a) summarizes the central argument and main points from the source, and (b) explains how the document contributes to the discussion of immigrants/refugees in Canada. 2) Detail the process used to locate the source: for example, what databases did you use to locate the source, what keywords did you use, how many sources did you find, did you have to refine your search, how did you confirm the source was a government document?

Part II: Locate the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (1 mark) Locate the Canadian Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, Inadmissibility sections: ss 33-43. Include a complete and correct citation of this act. Summarize the legislative purpose for enacting sections 33-43. What is/was the goal of enacting this law?

Part IV: Previous version of the statute (1 mark) Section 35(1)(2) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act existed in a previous version of the Act. Locate the previous version of this section and explain what changes were made to this section. (50 words) Note: This section does not require a citation. Part V: Delegated Legislation: Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (1 Mark) Locate the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations.4 Provide the correct citation for this regulation. Briefly explain what is the objective of sections 34(1)(2)(3)

Part VI: Locate Bill C-11, An Act respecting immigration to Canada and the granting of refugee protection to persons who are displaced, persecuted, or in danger. (3 marks) On what date did this bill achieve royal assent, if it has not received royal assent at what stage is the bill today? (Note: This section does not require a citation). At the House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, Meeting 17, describe the arguments detailed by Avvy Yao-Yao Go (Lawyer) from the Metro Toronto Chinese and Southeast Asian Legal Clinic. Does she support or have concerns about this bill? (Note: This section does not require a citation). Who gave the first speech in favor of this Bill at Second Reading in the House of Commons and give a summary of their main argument in support of the Bill? (100-150 words) (Note: This section does not require a citation