• Provide an argument to support the position that the Exclusionary Rule goes too far by limiting the ability of law enforcement officers to pursue investigations, and ultimately allowing criminals to go free. Provide a hypothetical example to illustrate your position.
• Provide an argument to support the opposite position -- that the Exclusionary Rule does not afford enough protections to individuals suspected of criminal activity due to the many exceptions to that Rule. Provide a hypothetical example to illustrate your position.
• Conclude your initial post with a statement of which of the above positions you most closely agree. Explain why you chose this position.