Provide feedback to two of your peer's work with the following checklist. Article: m:rrwww.m.comrthinIdopinionIS-yearoId-shoots-teacher-virginia-can-rehabilitated-rcna65144 El Critical Response: 3 points of discussion .3 3 subheadings for points of analysis .3 no further summary a examples and quotes used for support C rifle in] Response Reasoning The author was able to put down reasonings that is presented in a logical fashion. Despite the facts about the suspect's actions were proven true, the author is empathetic and compassionate due to the fact that she is also a psychologist, wherein she understands the circumstances of the victim and his family are facing. Cook provides facts based on research about the moral development of a child is still incomplete. And its core understanding for right and wrong happens not earlier than 9 years old. Dean W15. a professor at Medical University of South Carolina and a director of the National Crime Victims Res arch and Treatment Center mentioned that \"Given a 6-year-old child's lack of cognitive and moral development, it makes little sense to pursue aggressive criminal or juvenile justice prosecution of the child. He does not have the capacity to be legally responsible for this act.\" (Cook, 2023, para. 5). Wherein the author concludes that the result of the child' s actions has caused trauma, first of all on the victim, the injured teacher, its classmates, and the community. For they will need to seek mental intervention for them to sulpass the tragic incident, as well as for them to move folward. Fairness The author's analysis about the article is fair and clear for all the arguments that she has mentioned are all based on facts and research. At first it may seem biased due to all the facts that she has reiterated on the article were based on a psychologist' s point of view, for she is also a psychologist, but there were also parts of the article whe1e she also intelviewed people with different career ba ckglound, wherein all their opinions and conclusions where all the same. And it is for the 6-year-old child should not face legal actions even if he has committed a serious crime, for he is still a minor and he is still not capable of the long-term punishment and he is not yet legally responsible for him to receive juvenile treatment. For whatever and whoever has committed a serious crime, it is expected by the conummity for the suspect that is proven guilty to face and pay the price for the criminal actions that they have committed. Assumptions By suggesting that the 6-year-old boy should not face criminal charges because of his actions, instead the boy, the victim, his classmates, and all in the community that is affected by the happenings should seek mental health inteivention. Cook is making the assumption that such a plan would be a great in order for them to heal, move forward, and to avoid future circumstances like this from happening again. However, criminal offenses like this even if the perpetrator is a minor, should not be tolerated or normalized. Cook also suggests that school- based progams and the household intelvention is vely important for a child, and for them to have a safe space, because that is the only way for them to expe1ience and learn values that they will get in order to have a healthy view of themselves and into the world. Critical Response Generalization 'Nhile it is benecial for the author to highlight the need for early social intervention and violent behavioral recovery rehabilitation for the 6-year-old child, it creates room for generalization as we do not know the exact facts and circumstances surrounding the incident. 1While early intervention is important, the writer is guaranteeing a positive outcome for all children, allowing for an unduly optimistic and simple narrative that may not hold true in every circumstance. The writer failed to recognize that the experience of each child is unique and that issues such as underlying psychological conditions, environmental factors, and the impact of the incidents will determine the effectiveness of treatment. To appropriately advocate the best outcome for kids involved in comparable circumstances, more evidence must be employed. Assumption Cook argues that early intervention and mental health care are necessary to address the child's behavior, but she neglects to recognize that not all individuals react to intervention equally and that some instances may be more difficult than others. Additiona lly, Cook made the assumption that though early intervention, children will recover, but she disregarded the likelihood of underlying psychological disorders or chronic diseases, trauma history, and other factors. Cook generalized the challenges of managing violent behavior in youngsters and presupposed universal success, which might create unrealistic expectations. A more tailored approach is needed to properly develop effective strategies to help children with violent behavior at such a young age. Fair hiinded The writer has done a phenomenal job of calling for understanding and compassion for the 6-year-old child. Throughout the article. it is clear that she is fair minded as she seeks to help the child, parents, and everyone else affected by this situation. Cook draws attention to the case's drawbacks and complications in the article. including the child's immaturity in terms of moral and cognitive development and the futility of imprisonment or other legal action. Cook provided multiple intervention and support ideas for all impacted individuals