Provide the IRAC Analysis for the following mini-case:

Suzy Que resides in North Carolina, a major supplier of the vape chemicals used in the new smoking pipes. Suzy filed a lawsuit against VapAttack Inc., a manufacturer, and supplier of VAP chemicals. Suzy's claim alleges lung damages incurred from third-party Vap product users. Suzy is suing VapAttack Inc. in federal court in the county she lives. Suzy and most of the state's tobacco growers and their employees live in the same county where she filed suit. VapAttack Inc., as the defendant, filed a Motion with the Federal District Court. The Motion requested the court to change the location of the lawsuit from Plaintiff's county to Vap's headquarters county located in the same state. What is the basis for the Motion filed by VapAttack Inc? What grounds would Vap argue to have the court grant his Motion? What grounds for removal would the court review in deciding the Motion? Is the request to move the case to Vap's county prejudicial or, is there a legal theory that would permit the court to move the case to Defendants county? What is the name of the theory that permits Defendants to move a case to the company location? How does it work? What is the Jurisdiction of the Federal District Court in a state? Does Venue have an impact on these issues? Does Suzy have the Standing to file her claim? Why, why not? What is the likelihood that the court grants Vap's Motion? Why? Limit your analysis to the requested Motion, not the merits of the case. Do not try the cases; analyze the merits of the Motion don't judge.

Explain why the legal definition of Diversity of Citizenship applies to the specific facts.