Provide thorough information below when it comes to Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York :

• Background Material (including lower court proceedings and how the cases have fared as they made their way through the judicial system - and possibly some information about why this sort of issue is important in the legal system);
• Case FACTS (including the pertinent specific facts of the involvement of the significant actors in the legal dramas presented, especially involving the plaintiff(s), the defendant(s), the key witnesses, etc.);
• Case ISSUE(S) (stated in question format and generalizable to future cases - and not specific to just this case. Issues, when posed correctly, "stand on their own." In other words, an attorney or someone else conducting research can understand the legal issues of the case without reading the whole case);
• RULES OF LAW (including statutory law or Constitutional citation, if applicable in the cases at hand);
• PRECEDENTS (previous cases cited by the courts in the two cases - but note, the student should only cite one or two important precedential cases and not take up too much space with this item);
• Case HOLDING (the position taken by the court in each of the two cases described by the student);
• Definitions (that is, definitions of 2-3 legal terms found in the case(s), that are of particular interest to the student);
• Student's Personal Summary, including real-world implications;
• Citation and discussion of at least one law journal article, on topic;
• Description of why the court held the way it did (in the opinion of the student); and
• Explanation of the losing side's strongest argument(s).