provision regarding bicycles: "Provided that bicycles shall be allowed in the park, so long as theyare being pushed or carried and not ridden."Here, this rule implies that the allowances for bicycles are limited to those being pushed or carried, not bicycles being ridden. This interpretation stipulates that bicycles can only be in the park under certain conditions and clarifies that while bicycles are included in the context of "vehicles," they are exempt from the restrictions enacted so long as they do not create a safety hazard.Although the statute being argued was enacted in 1979, judicial precedent can potentially alter the statute, in turn, altering the rulings in the above cases. For example, the introduction of the 1985 precedent regarding Ginny Weasley and her battery-operated Barbie jeep may complicate the matter. This precedent indicates that a battery-operated toy can be classified as a "vehicle" under this statute. As a result, the judge may be influenced by this precedent in ruling on Harry and Luna's case. For Harry and Luna, the ruling is likely to remain the same. Since Harry's skateboard is still non-motorized and does not fit the categorical vehicles that create safety concerns, he will likely be found not in violation of the statute. Similarly, for Luna, the precedentwill not sway the judge to rule differently. That is because Luna violated the original statute by riding her tricycle instead of pushing or carrying it.With the amendment to the ordinance stipulating that a person may be convicted if their "vehicle" can convey a person faster than 5 mph, th