psychodynamic, reality therapy (choice theory), about child/adolescent therapy. Each of these are described in detail in the Kress et al. text.

Based on your reading of the Kress et al. course text, select two orientations to review. The aim of this paper is to provide a high-level overview regarding how effective the two orientations are for children/adolescents as well as to summarize any limitations. For each orientation you review, students will, first, discuss how that therapy is effective for children (e.g., is the therapy best for kids of a certain age or with a certain set of concerns? Or, what about this therapy is uniquely designed to help children/adolescents improve?).

should NOT summarize the orientation. Rather, students should focus onhow andwhy the therapy is effective in helping children/adolescents. 1 peer-reviewed source per orientation (so at least 2 total) to enhance their effectiveness reviews. demonstrate how and why the therapy is effective for children and/or adolescents, then, second, please offer a critique of the orientations individually. Your critique of each orientation should contain your examination (written professionally, not colloquially) of thelimitations of the therapy. For example, are there cultural groups that might not benefit from this therapy? Is this therapy limited in its evidence base (e.g., not a lot of research to demonstrate it's effective)? Students should consider multi-cultural applicability in their evaluation. The aim of this section is to demonstrate your critical eye in how you evaluate the appropriateness of this therapy for a wide audience.