Purpose:The purpose of this project is to research, analyze and compare the common law mirror image rule with the "Battle of the Forms".

Course Outcomes Met by this Assignment:

• research applicable law and gather information to analyze a contract issue and support a legal conclusion
• identify and analyze contractual issues
• explain contract concepts, remedies, and procedures to support a legal conclusion

Review:CALI - Battle of the Forms

Background:Liberty needs a presentation for a client from Parsons manufacturing company to explain whether the client has a valid case.The client will be accompanied by in-house counsel from Parsons, so Liberty wants the presentation to be comprehensive in covering all contract law technicalities but must also be easy to understand.

Facts:Parsons' manufacturing company is in the business of building chairs.Quality Furniture Company (QFC) sent a Purchase Order to Parsons for 200 chairs at $50.00 per chair.The QFC purchase order was silent as to a warranty.

Parsons responded by sending its acknowledgment form that stated 100 chairs were to be purchased at $50.00 per chair.Preprinted on a Parsons sales form was the statement that "all chairs are warranted for 60 days as to defects and workmanship."

Parsons sent the 200 chairs and QFC accepted them and paid in full.Thirty days later, QFC noticed that the chairs were splintering due to faulty workmanship.

Instructions:Compare the common law mirror image rule with the UCC battle of the forms and evaluating the Parsons - QFC contract for purchase of chairs.

My question is... IS THIS A VALID CASE?