Q 6.2:InCruzan, the Court recognized that competent adults have a constitutionally protected liberty interest in determining their medical care, including the "right to refuse lifesaving hydration and nutrition." Yet, inGlucksberg, the Court found that terminally ill patients do not have a constitutionally protected right to physician-assisted suicide.Were the two decisions consistent? How does the Court's approach in these cases compare to its approach to constitutional analysis in the area of abortion?