Q1: A agrees to bail 10 tons of iron with a specific mark to B. B alters the iron and return iron with a different mark. A sues B. Decide if the case is vaiid, also give your decision on the case 2- Discuss agency by ratification with example 3/Discuss doctrine of caveat emptor from the view point of sale of goods with example

4. Identify the specimen given and mention the name of the negotiable instrument. Identify the parties to the instrument. Also mention if all the information is completely filled or not.

5/Discuss Escrow from the view point of negotiable instrument with example

Q2: Ahmad was instructed by his employer Ali to carry a consignment of milk from Township to Shah Alam. He was driving the lorry carefully but it got badly damaged because it was involved in a road accident near PU New Campus. Since he did not want to wait too long for the lorry to be repaired and milk was also about to expire, Ahmad sold of all the milk to shop owner for half of its price. Ali claimed for breach of duty as an agent. Ahmad stated that he tried his best as agent in performing the duties. Discuss the position of Ahmad with regards to this problem keeping in view the agency contract,

Q3: Solve according to the Law of Sales of Goods. Classify the transactions according to the type of goods they are I) A agrees to buy 100 perfumes selected and set aside in the lot ii. A agrees to buy any 2 bales of cotton from the lot iii-A agrees to buy bananas which are yet to be produced this year

Q4: B). Aslam, Zara, and Rafia form a partnership in oral for ten years. Please answer the following: Is this partnership valid? State your reasoning ii. Can this partnership be proven in court? State your reasoning

Q5: Please solve the both parts as per Partnership Act, 1932. All cases are independent of each other a.) John started a business of water filters named "AquaFinaltica". To raise funds, he took 100000 dollars from his friend Harry. They formed the following agreement in written .Harry will share the profit and losses equal to 35% .Harry will have the right to check the books of accounts at will

.Harry will have the right of receiving semiannual report of business .Harry will contribute in major decisions of the firm Five years later, John thought that he should get retired and sell the company. On discussing the situation with Harry, Harry showed interest in huying the company being a partner. John got shocked because he never considered Harry as a partner, but only an investor. According to Harry, Harry was entitled to receive 35% from the proceeds of sale which is equivalent to his share 100000 dollars

Q6: Please solve the both parts as per Law of Carriage of Goods Act. All cases are independent of each other

a.) Fahim was a charter party for a vessel. He paid charges to Boston Company as a charter party. Ho Company promised that vessel will be seaworthy and will be anchored at 30 feet height to make it seaworthy. Before the start of journey, the Fahim checked if the vessel is anchored at 30 feet Neight Vessel was exact at measurements After the journey started, vessel showed some problems with engine, engine heated op again and again due to which captain had to take breaks. Captain paid 5000 charges for repairs but still its engine was

not working well. Due to which delay also occurred.

Please answer the following keeping in view the above situation

i) Can Fahim suc Boston Company? If yes, then state the reasons and build an argument to sue)

ii) Who is liable for demurrage" Can Fahim recover demurrage from Boston Company? Explain with reasoning