Q1

Although weird, it is perfectly legal to sell your voice in exchange for land legs. (Don't judge their society.) Therefore, the agreement between Ariel and Ursula is a:

Group of answer choices

valid and enforceable contract.

a valid, but voidable contract.

a valid, but unenforceable contract.

a void contract

Q2

Give your reasoning for question 2:

Group of answer choices

All four required elements of contract formation have been met, and there are no legal defenses.

Ariel has the option of avoiding the contract.

Ursula has the option of avoiding the contract.

All 4 required elements of contract formation have not been met.

Q3

Should a court find that Ursula exercised undue influence over Ariel?

Group of answer choices

yes

no

Q4

Should a court find that Ursula placed Ariel under duress?

Group of answer choices

yes

no

Q5

Ursula seemed nice and very helpful, so Ariel agreed to give her voice in exchange for land legs. Suppose I told you Ursula is a very bad witch and she had no intention of keeping her end of the bargain, even if Ariel was able to secure true love's kiss from Eric by the 3rd day. In fact, Ursula planned to do everything possible to stop it. If Ariel does not seal a kiss by day 3 and Ursula takes Ariel's soul, should Ariel be successful in a claim of fraudulent misrepresentation against Ursula?

Group of answer choices

Yes, all elements of fraudulent misrepresentation are met.

No, all elements of fraudulent misrepresentation are not met.

Q6

Not related to Ariel and Ursula....I'm just asking you, in general, does a unilateral mistake of fact allow a mistaken party any rights to relief from the contract.

Group of answer choices

yes

no