Q1)

Hammaker Manufacturing Corp. began operations in year 1 and reported taxable net income of $10 million and $4 million in year 1 and year 2, respectively. In year 3, Hammaker reports a net operating loss (NOL) of $16 million. The tax rate for the years year 1 and year 2 is 35%, but the enacted tax rate for year 3 and later years will be 21%. As part of year-end adjusting entries, what total tax benefit will Hammaker record as a result of the year 3 NOL? Multiple Choice $3,360,000 $5,600,000 $5,320,000 $4,340,000

Q2)

After many years of success, Kaputnik Co. recorded net operating losses for the years year 13 through year 16, totaling $250 million, resulting in the recording of large deferred tax assets based on the assumption of a rapid return to profitability. However, attempts by management to revamp its outmoded business model have so far failed. A radical final attempt to save the company will be implemented in year 18. It will entail selling off the vast majority of Kaputniks asset groups while maintaining a small but promising segment. The projected outlook for the near term is a modest net profit of $5 million over the next three years, beyond which it is impossible to determine if Kaputnik Co. will even still be in existence. The enacted tax rate has been 35% for the last several years and is expected to be 21% in year 17 and future years. No addition to the deferred tax asset balance will be recorded for year 17, during which Kaputnik recorded a $70 million net operating loss, nor has Kaputnik ever recorded a deferred tax asset valuation allowance. Given these facts, what amount should Kaputnik record as Valuation allowance deferred tax asset as part of its year 17 year-end adjusting entries?

Multiple Choice

• $87,500,000

• $86,450,000

• $101,150,000

• $85,750,000