Q1: How does heteronormativity harm the lgbtq2ia+people?

Q2: In the past, censorship has been used as a way to limit abuses of freedom of expression. Should "compelled speech" fall under such limitations?

Q3: Is refusing to use gender-neutral pronouns part of a 'bigger systemic level'?

Q4: Could "compelled speech" laws potentially be dangerous?

Q5: Is mandatory use of gender-neutral pronouns truly a violation?

Q6: If it is an interference of free speech, does the positive result outweigh it?

Q7: Would this law (mandatory use of gender-neutral pronouns) promote recognition of gender identity and reduce discrimination?

Q8: Would not having this law have real social, emotional and political impact on people who identify as transgender/non-binary?

Q9: Is it possible to imagine a scenario where each right is enjoyed or is the natural result that one sacrifices over the other?

Q10: Which right can reasonably be compromised so that one side receives minimal compensation?