Q1 List the cumulative yield ratios for each recruiting source. Round to the nearest whole percent (_{e.g., 16.8% would become 17%, and 33.2% would become 33%}).

Q2 List the cost-per-hire for each recruitment source. Round to the nearest whole dollar (_{i.e., don't display cents}).

Q3 Assuming that the quality of all new hires you hired was the same across all recruitment sources, identify which source generated new hires most effectively. Use our definition of effectiveness as lowest cost-per-hire to guide your response.

Your recruitment efforts resulted in the generation of

100 resumes from the local universities,

175 resumes from the specialty universities,

50 from print newspaper ads,

420 from online postings, and

20 from Manpower.

These are the number of applicants from each recruitment source. Of these,

30 local universities and

50 specialty universities applicants were called for interviews, as were

10 of the print newspaper ads applicants,

42 of the online postings applicants, and

10 of the Manpower applicants

After onsite interviews were conducted, job offers were extended to, and accepted by,

18 of the local university applicants,

25 of the specialty university applicants,

6 of the print newspaper ad applicants,

12 of the online posting applicants, and

5 of the Manpower applicants.

The total cost of recruitment at the local universities was

$10000,

$19000 for the specialty universities,

$5000 for the print newspaper ads,

$3000 for the online job board postings, and

$24000 for Manpower