q1 :

When discussing ethics and morals, a common topic of debate involves whether these concepts arerelative(i.e., our ideas regarding right and wrongwill vary significantlybased upon ourupbringing, culture, religious beliefs, etc.) orabsolute (i.e.,certain actions areabsolutelyright or wrong, regardless of our upbringing, culture, religious beliefs, etc.).

In your opinion, isallmorality relative (i.e., simply an individual's definition of right and wrong), or are certain moral conceptsabsolute? Should everyone have the right to decide which behaviors are acceptable or unacceptable?

Couldvariances in the manner in which criminal justice professionalsview morals and ethics as eitherabsoluteorrelativeimpactday-to-day decision making?Explainyour answer.

q2:

After reading the History of the Supreme Court Exclusionary Rule article, select one of the four highlighted cases and answer the below questions.

Briefly explain your selected case, then discuss how the ruling in the case impacts an investigator's ability to obtain evidence during a criminal investigation.

Discuss in detail the impact of the exclusionary rule has on evidence illegally obtained.

Ensure you research your selected case further and do not exclusively rely on the article for a detailed description of the case.

PLEASE LABEL WHICH ONE YOU ANSWER AS QUESTION 1 AND QUESTION 2!