Question
Q1-A 20-year study of British male physicians (R. Doll and R. Peto, British Med. J., 2: 1525-1536, 1976) noted that the proportion who died from
Q1-A 20-year study of British male physicians (R. Doll and R. Peto, British Med. J.,
2: 1525-1536, 1976) noted that the proportion who died from lung cancer was
0.00140 per year for cigarette smokers and 0.00010 per year for nonsmokers.
The proportion who died from heart disease was 0.00669 for smokers and
0.00413 for nonsmokers.
a. Describe the association of smoking with lung cancer and with heart disease,
using the difference of proportions, the relative risk, and the odds ratio.
Interpret.
b. Which response (lung cancer or heart disease) is more strongly related to
cigarette smoking, in terms of the reduction in deaths that could occur with
an absence of smoking?
Q2-Table 2.12 comes from one of the first studies of the link between lung cancer
and smoking, by Richard Doll and A. Bradford Hill. In 20 hospitals in London,
UK, patients admitted with lung cancer in the previous year were queried
about their smoking behavior. For each patient admitted, researchers studied
the smoking behavior of a noncancer control patient at the same hospital of the
Table 2.12. Data for Problem 2.16
Lung Cancer
Have Smoked Cases Controls
Yes 688 650
No 21 59
Total 709 709
Based on data reported in Table IV, R. Doll and A. B. Hill, Br. Med. J.,
739-748, September 30, 1950.
same sex and within the same 5-year grouping on age. A smoker was defined
as a person who had smoked at least one cigarette a day for at least a year.
a. Identify the response variable and the explanatory variable.
b. Can you use these data to compare smokers with nonsmokers in terms of
the proportion who suffered lung cancer? Why or why not?
c. Summarize the association, and explain how to interpret it.
Q3-Table 2.14 was taken from the 2002 General Social Survey.
a. Test the null hypothesis of independence between party identification and
race. Interpret.
Table 2.14. Data for Problem 2.19
Party Identification
Race Democrat Independent Republican
White 871 444 873
Black 302 80 43
b. Use standardized residuals to describe the evidence.
c. Partition the chi-squared into two components, and use the components to
describe the evidence.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started