[Q2] (3 Suppose that you are finally ready to purchase your first house, and have determined that the most important things to consider are: price, future maintenance costs, location (close to your office or not), and neighborhood safety. (Square footage obviously is also important, but let's assume that the final options all have similar square footage.) After a long period of house searching, you have narrowed down your choices to the following three options: - House A: price: $200K, built year: 2000, location: 5 minutes work, neighborhood: decent; - House B: price: $280K, built year: 2015, location: 20 minutes to work, neighborhood: best; - House C: price: $150K, built year: 1960, location: 10 minutes to work, neighborhood: has some concerns (meaning, not as good as House A). (Note that the following questions are more open-ended. Feel free to make whatever assumptions you need to make. The final answer is not important; what is important is the process/analysis that leads to your conclusion.) a) While nobody knows what the future maintenance costs would be of a house, the built year of a house may provide some indication. Generally speaking, newer houses would have lower maintenance costs down the road. (You can ignore the time value of money in this question.) Suppose that you are risk neutral; please use the multi-attribute additive utility framework to help you decide which house should you choose. (You need to provide the details of how you come up with the utilities and the weights. For the weighting, you cannot just directly assign the weights without any justifications or derivations.) b) Now suppose that you are risk-averse in terms of future maintenance costs, how would you modify your analysis in Part (a)