Quantitative Problem: Bellinger Indutries is considering two projects for indusion in iss capital budget, and you have been asked to do the analys s. Both profects' anter-tax cash fows are thown on the time line below, Depreciation, salvoge values, net operatiog working capital requirements, and tax effects are all included in these cash flows. Both projects have 4ryear lives, and they have risk characteristics similar to the firm's average project. Bellinger's WACC is 9%. What is Project A's zRR? Do not round intermediate calculations. flound your answer to two decimal places. What is Project B's IRR? Do not round intermediate calcultions. Round your answer to two decimal places. If the projects were independent, which proyect(s) would be accepted according to the tRR mathod? Thiecil If the peojects were mutualy exclusive, which profect(5) would be accested according to the tres method? Could there be a confict with project acceptance between the NPV and TRR approsches when prejects are mutually exclutive? The reason is Reinvestment at the decisisn. is the superion assumption, so when matually exclusive projects are evaluated the approsch should be used for the capital busgeting Quantitative Problemt Beilinger industries is considering two projects for inclusion in its capital budget, and you have been asked to do the analysis. Bcth projects' after-tax cash flows are shown on the time line below. Deprecistion, salvage values, net operating warking capital requirements, and tex effects are all included in these cash flows. Both projects have 4-year lives, and they have risk characteristics simater to the firm's average project, Bellinger's Wacc is 9%. What is Project A's IRR? Do not round intermediate caiculations. Round your answer to two decinal places. What is Project B's JR9? Do not round intermediate calculetions; found your answer to two decimal places. It the projects were indesendent, which project(s) would be accepted according to the IRR method? nutually exclusive, which project(s) would be accepted according to the the method? Could there be a confict with project acceptance between the NPV and IRR approaches when projects are mutuaily exclusive? The reason is fleinvestrment at the teension. is the superier assumption, so when mutually exdusive projects are evaluated the - Fra. 9 approsch shoufd be used for the capital budgeling Quantitative Problem: Belinger industries is considering two projects for inclusion in its capital budget, and you have been asked to do the analysis. Hoth projects' after-tax cash fows are stown on the time line below. Depreclation, salvage values, net operating working capital requirements, and tax effects are all included in these cash fiows. Both projects hrve 4'yeay lives, and they have risk characteristics similar to the firm's averoge profect. Bellinger's Wacc is 996. What is Project A's IRR? Do not round ittermediate calculations. found your antwer to two decimal places. What is project B's tRR? Do not round intermediate calculations. Aound your answer to two decimal places. If the projects were independent, which project(s) would be accepted according to the that methos? If the projects nere mutually exclueive, which profect(s) would be acoepted according to the tiff method? filict with project acceptance between the tiP and 1RR abprosches when profects are mutusly exclusive? The teason is - reine Puinvesiment at the decising Is the superior assumptiso, so when mutually exclusve projects are evaluated the B. Quantitative Problem: Bellinger Industries is considering two projects for inclusion in its capital budget, and you have been asked to do the analysis. Both projects' after-ta have 4-year lives, and they have nisk chard ctoristics cimina ... n's n's average project. Bellinger's Wace is 9%, What is Projec B's IAR? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places. If the projects were independent, which project(s) would be accepted according to the IRR method? If the projects were mutually exdusive, which project(s) would be accepted according to the tret method? Could there be a confict with preject acceptance between the NPY and IRR approsches when projects are mutually exclusive? Reinvestment at the decision. is the superior assumption, so when mutualiy excluive projects are evalusted the weint a appreach ahouid be uted for the capital bucheting Qusntitative Problem: Be inger tndustries is consideding two peojects for indusion in its copital budget, and you hare been asked to do the analysis. Both projects' after tex cash fows are shonn on the time line below. Deprecation, salyage values, net operating working capital requirements, and tax effects are ait included in these cagh flows. Both prejects Have 4.year lives, and they have nisk characteriesies similar to the firm's average project. Bellinger's Wacc is 9%6. What is Project A's Ifor? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places. What is Project B's IRR? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimbl pleces. If the projectr were independent, which preject(s) would be accepted according to the IRQ methad? If the projects were mutually exclustve, which project(s) would be accepted accoiding to the IRR method? Could there be a connict with project acceptance between the NPV and thk approathes when projects are mutually exclusive? The reason defidotdetision. Ch 11- Glueprint Problems - The Basics of Capital Budgeting Quantitative Problem: Beilinger industries is consldering two projects for inclusion in its capital budget, and you have been asked to do the analysis. Both projects' after-tax ca ffows are thown on the time line below. Depreciation, salvage values, net operating working capital requirements, aod tax effects are all included in these. cash flows. Both profect have A-year ilves, and they hove nisk characteristics similar to the firm's average project. Aellinger's WhCC is 9%. What is Project A's Ife?? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places. What is Project as iRA? Do not round intermediate calculaticns. Acund your anawer to two decimal places. If the projecs were independent, which project(s) would be accepted accerding to the thR method? If the prejects were mutually exclusive, which project(s) would be accepted according to the taR method? Could there be a confict with project acceptance between the NDV and tRR approaches when peojects are mutualiy exclusive? The reason is Reinvestment at 1 decivion. Is the superior assumption, so when mutualy exclusive projects are evaluated the - lath a approech should be used for the capkal buegeting Quantitative Problem: Bellinger Industries is considering two projects for inclusion in its capital budget, and you have been asked to do the analysis. Both projects' after-tax c flows are shown on the time line below. Depreciation, salvage values, net operating working capital requirements, and rax effects are all incluced in these cash fiows. Both proph have 4-year ives, and they have risk characteristics similar to the firm's average project. Alellinger's wacc is 9%. What is Project A's TRR? Do not round intermedlate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places. What is Project 8 's IRR? Do not round intermediote calculations. Round your answer to two docimal places. If the projects were independent, which project(s) would be accepted according to the taA method? If the projects were mutually exclusive, which project(s) would be accepted occording to the IfR method? Could there be a confict with project acceptance betwoen the NFV and tRh approaches when projects are mutually exclusive? The reasan is spiect. Reinvestment at the decision: is the superior assumption, so when mutually excluaive projects are evaluated t