Question 1 (1 point) In a trial involving two businesses, the plaintiff submitted that there was an obvious precedent to follow. However, in making a judicial decision the judge decided not to follow the decision that the plaintiff submitted applied to the case under deliberation. What likely happened? 0 The trial judge knew of but simply ignored the precedent with no basis for doing so. 0 The trial judge thought there was sufficient distinguishing facts between the two matters. 0 The trial judge forgot about the precedent. The trial judge decided to follow a case that neither of the businesses mentioned during the trial