Question 1 (1 point) Saved What of the following is a form of unprotected speech? 0 Fighting words O True threats 6) All of the above O Incitement Question 2 (1 point) Public figures and public officials: 0 Cannot sue a newspaper for defamation. O Cannot sue a private citizen for defamation. 0 Must prove actual malice to prevail on a defamation claim. Q Are immune from claims of defamation. Question 3 (1 point) What did roomates.com do that did not warrant Section 230 protection? 0 Allow property owners to explicitly state preferences about tenant gender. 0 Allow property owners to explicitly state preferences about tenant family status. 0 Allowed property owners to refuse payment based on the country of origin of the payment. 0 Use subscriber qualities such as race and family to steer tenants away from posts where property owners stated preferences about family status and gender. Question 4 (1 point) A lawyer who delivers legal services to auto mechanics includes a provision in each customer contract that the customer must assign, to the mechanic, the copyright to any online reviews. What concept best describes why I do this? 0 Slander Question 5 (1 point) Defamation includes both libel and slander. Question 6 (1 point) Which is an example of speech protected by the First Amendment? 0 Military secrets 0 Classified documents 0 Criticizing the government 0 Troop movements during wartime Question 7 (1 point) What level of scrutiny do courts apply to restrictions on political speech, one of the most protected categories of speech? 0 Time, place, and manner 0 Diminished protection 0 Intermediate scrutiny O Strict scrutiny Question 8 (1 point) There are sites which find embarrassing but otherwise publicly available content and republish that, exposing the content to larger audiences. These sites are known as: O Extortion sites O Exploitation sites Question 9 (1 point) The First Amendment prohibits which group from limiting speech? 0 Employers 0 Private parties 0 All of the above 0 The government Question 10 (1 point) Notwithstanding the protections of Section 230, site owners can be liable for content. Which of the following is not an exception to Section 230 protection? 0 The site owner makes changes significant changes to objectionable content. 0 The site owner promises to remove unauthorized material but does not. Q The site owner is also a newspaper publisher. 0 The site owner creates the objectionable content. Question 11 (1 point) Section 230: O Applies to articles written by staff writers on a news website, but only if the site publishes online only; no paper. 0 Protects a site owner against defamation claims if the claims arise from comments posted by anonymous site visitors, it does not protect the site owner if the comments can be traced to a person via their IP address. 0 Protects speakers and writers from defamation claims. Protects a site owner from defamation claims arising from comments posted by all site visitors. Question 12 (1 point) What form of speech is not protected by the first amendment? 0 Criminal speech 0 Lies about scientific facts 0 Depictions of violence 0 Medical advertising Question 13 (1 point) A court can prevent a defendant from discussing their trial. Question 14 (1 point) Which statement is true? 0 Section 230 does not protect professional news organizations which employ staff writers if those writers post defamatory content. But a blogger who hosts their own content is not a staff writer employed by a news organization, so a blogger is protected by 230. 0 Section 230 does not protect professional news organizations which employ staff writers if those staff writers post defamatory content. A blogger who hosts their own blog and writes their own content is similarly not protected by 230. Question 15 (1 point) If a site hosts a pornographic photo of a plaintiff, courts will ask whether the photo is a selfie. This is true because the plaintiff owns the copyright and can use DMCA to force a takedown of a selfie. O This is false because neither the DMCA nor Section 230 give greater weight to selfies. This is false because it is illegal for a site to post any pornographic photo without the plaintiff's permission. 0 This is true because the plaintiff can use Section 230 to force a takedown of a selfie. Question 16 (1 point) Media defendants and non-media defendants are treated differently when a court is considering damages. Which statement is true? 0 To recover presumed or punitive damages against a media defendant, a plaintiff must prove knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for truth. 0 To recover presumed or punitive damages against a non-media defendant, a plaintiff must prove knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for truth. Question 17 (1 point) How did Anthony Elonis's case conclude? O The Supreme Court reversed his conviction. O The appeals court upheld his conviction. 0 He was convicted under a criminal statute that makes threats illegal. O He was released before trial. Question 18 (1 point) A statement is libelous if it says something bad about a person, and if the statement hurts the reputation of the person. Question 19 (1 point) Which is not an element of defamation? 0 Truth 0 Publicly spoken or published 0 Damages reputation of another 0 Clear identification of the defamed party Question 20 (1 point) Like the DMCA, Section 230 has a takedown provision, meaning that site owners must take down defamatory comments once notified by the target of the defamation