Question 1 30 pts In Kelo v. New London and Kaur v. NYS, there was controversy concerning whether "economic development" (jobs, amenities, and tax revenue) satisfies the 5th Amendment stipulation that private property can only be taken for a "public use." What might be wrong with "economic development" as a reason to take private property even though just compensation is paid? Edit View Insert Format Tools Table 12pt Paragraph Tv Bay : P o words Question 1 30 pts In Kelo v. New London and Kaur v. NYS, there was controversy concerning whether "economic development" (jobs, amenities, and tax revenue) satisfies the 5th Amendment stipulation that private property can only be taken for a "public use." What might be wrong with "economic development" as a reason to take private property even though just compensation is paid? Edit View Insert Format Tools Table 12pt Paragraph Tv Bay : P o words