Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
QUESTION 1 An example of an unconscionable contract is: The contract requires one party to supply a product at a discount One party agrees to
QUESTION 1
- An example of an unconscionable contract is:
- The contract requires one party to supply a product at a discount
- One party agrees to pay a 25% premium to obtain the product
- The contract requires a party to only hire women for a specific job
- The contract requires a party to sell exclusively to the party
1 points
QUESTION 2
- Defamation requires that the Plaintiff prove what?Choose the most correct statement:
- That a statement was made
- That the false statement harmed the Plaintiff
- That the false statement harmed the Plaintiff, and the harm exceeds $10,000.00
- That the statement was false
1 points
QUESTION 3
- A court will only consider whether a Plaintiff is contributory negligent or if the Plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk, after the Defendant has been found liable.
- True
- False
1 points
QUESTION 4
- In contract law, consideration refers to:
- The exchange of something of value
- The exchange of money
- The exchange of goods
- One of the elemets required to have a valid contract
- All of the above
- None of the above
1 points
QUESTION 5
- A court will invalidate a contract if it finds that there was:
- Undue influence
- Illegal activity
- Evidence that one of the parties lacks mental capacity at the time the contract was entered into
- All of the above
- A and B only
1 points
QUESTION 6
- Hasan yells and screams at Hoda at work in front of their colleagues.Hasan says he is going to kill her if she does not do what he asks her to do.Hoda was so scared by Hasan's behaviour that she stops working at the company.Hoda then sues Hasan.What does Hoda sue for?
- Battery
- Defamation
- All of the above
- None of the above
1 points
QUESTION 7
- Bicycles Inc.'s supplier is contractually required to deliver the bicycles every Tuesday between March and August. One week in July, the supplier fails to deliver the bicycles on time.Instead of delivering on a Tuesday, it delivers them on a Wednesday.This is a breach of the contract.What kind of breach is it?
- Breach of condition
- Breach of warranty
- Breach of condition and warranty
- It is not a breach
1 points
QUESTION 8
- An example of a condition precedent is:
- A guarantee that the home is in good condition at the time sale
- My offer to buy the car is conditional upon me obtaining financing for the car
- The contract is based on the condition that the Christmas toys will all be delivered before the Christmas shopping season begins
- All of the above
- None of the above
1 points
QUESTION 9
- Guya agrees to sell her house to Fredricka for $700,000.00. They shake on it but do not confirm their agreement in writing. Which statement is most accurate:
- Their agreement is not valid because it is not in writing and therefore there is no proof of the sale
- Their agreement is not valid because it is not in writing and only contracts in writing are valid
- Their agreement is not valid because it is not in writing and all purchase and sales agreement for land must be in writing
- Their agreement is not valid because it is not in writing
1 points
QUESTION 10
- Groot offers to buy Rocket's space pod for $10,000.00 if Rocket accepts his offer by 2pm on Tuesday. Rocket accepts Groot's offer at 7pm on Tuesday.Which statement is most accurate:
- Groot's offer was not open for acceptance
- Groot revoked the offer
- Groot did not make an offer, Rocket did
- Groot did not accept Rocket's offer
1 points
QUESTION 11
- Boris hired Siera as a customer service representative at his electronics store.In the employment contract that Boris wrote, it said on the first page under wages that she would earn $15.00 per hour.But on page 3 under renumeration it said she would earn $16.00 per hour.A dispute arises over how much Siera is to be paid.If this went to court, which statement is most likely to occur
- A court would rule in favour of Siera, and she would be entitled to $16.00 per hour because Boris wrote the contract and where there is any confusion the court rules in favour of the one who did not write the contract
- A court would rule in favour of Boris and Siera would be entitled to $15.00 per hour, because the court would not want to interfere in the bargaining between two consenting adults
- A court would rule in favour of Boris, and Siera would be entitled to $15.00 per hour because where there is any confusion about contract terms, it was Siera's responsibility to ensure that the contract terms were clear before signing it
- A court would rule in favour of Siera, and she would be entitled to $16.00 per hour because that is the higher of the two
1 points
QUESTION 12
- An engineer breaches their standard of care if:
- Their work is not perfect
- Their work does not meet the client's expectations
- Their work is not that of a competent engineer
- They make a mistake
1 points
QUESTION 13
- An occupier can minimize their risk by:
- Removing all snow and ice from walkways
- Cleaning up spills immediately
- Having insurance
- Repairing all hazards immediately
- All of the above
1 points
QUESTION 14
- Jade and Judy entered into a contract for Jade to provide IT services to Judy for a monthly fee.A dispute arose between the two as to whether Jade's services included after-hours IT service as part of the monthly fee or whether an additional fee was to be paid by Judy.If a court were to get involved, which of the following statements is most accurate?
- The court will want to know what Judy and Jade expected when they entered into the contract
- The court will want to know who wrote the contract
- The court will look at what industry standards are to determine what is appropriate ifthe parties did not discuss this issue when they negotiated the contract
- All of the above
- None of the above
1 points
QUESTION 15
- In order for a Plaintiff to be successful in their negligence lawsuit, they have to prove the damages were foreseeable.
- True
- False
1 points
QUESTION 16
- Borgia embezzled money from her clients.The clients sue Borgia and her employer.Her employer says they are not liable because Borgia committed a crime. Why is Borgia's employer liable?
- They are vicariously liable for what Borgia did
- They should have audited and supervised her more carefully to prevent the embezzling
- A and B
- They are not liable because Borgia committed a crime
1 points
QUESTION 17
- Hogan thinks Harry is trying to steal art supplies from Hogan's store.Hogan confronts Harry and asks him to wait and not leave the store until the police arrive.If Harry did not steal anything, which tort has Hogan committed?
- Assault
- Battery
- Deceit
- False imprisonment
1 points
QUESTION 18
- To minimize risk of allegations of passing off, a business owner should:
- Register the business' trademarks
- Not design their own logos, products or use slogans similar to their competitors'
- Research the marketplace before choosing a name and design for their products
- All of the above
1 points
QUESTION 19
- A duty to mitigate refers to:
- The Defendant's obligation to minimize the harm they cause to others
- The Plaintiff's obligation to minimize their damages from a breach of contract or other wrong
- The Plaintiff's obligation to minimize the harm they cause to others
- The Defendant's obligation to minimize their damages from a breach of contract or other wrong
1 points
QUESTION 20
- A new slaughterhouse is being built in the Stockyards community in Toronto.The residential neighbours oppose its construction.If the slaughterhouse is built, which tort is the most likely that the neighbours could sue for:
- Product liability
- Trespass
- Occupier's liability
- Nuisance
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started