Question
QUESTION 1: Prior to the release of AASB 2, many reporting entities failed to recognise the share options being provided to senior executives. Why? QUESTION
QUESTION 1:
Prior to the release of AASB 2, many reporting entities failed to recognise the share options being provided to senior executives. Why?
QUESTION 2:
Cottesloe Ltd has granted its managing director 50 000 share options conditional upon him remaining with the company for a further five years. In addition, the share price must increase by 50 per cent before the end of year 5.
REQUIRED:
How should Cottesloe Ltd account for the above vesting conditions?
QUESTION 3:
In an article that appeared in Business Review Weekly on 4 March 2004 (entitled 'Share options trap'), it is stated that under AASB 2 'companies must value and record as an expense any options granted to employees in exchange for their services. Previously, Australian companies recorded share-based payments in the notes to financial statements, arguing that share-based payments did not cost the company anything'.
REQUIRED:
Do you think that there is any logic to the argument that 'share-based payments did not cost the company anything'?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started