Question
QUESTION 1 When does actual malice have to be proved? When the plaintiff is a public figure/official in a libel or outrage case and always
QUESTION 1
- When does actual malice have to be proved?
When the plaintiff is a public figure/official in a libel or outrage case andalwaysin a false light case. | ||
Always in libel, false light and outrage cases. | ||
Only when the plaintiff is a public figure/official in libel, false light or outrage cases. |
QUESTION 2
- What was the rationale for the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Food Lion v. Capital Cities/ABC?
The circuit court of appeals did not believe actual malice had been proven in the lower court case. | ||
The circuit court of appeals said actual malice could not be applied because Food Lion did not allege any false statements in the reporting. | ||
Food Lion, because it is a company and not a person, did not have to prove actual malice. |
QUESTION 3
- Why couldn't Jerry Falwell prove hislibel claim against Hustler Magazine?
There was no defamatory language. | ||
There was no publication. | ||
There was no harm |
QUESTION 4
- Why could Jerry Falwell not prove actual malice in hisfalse light case against Hustler?
There was no falsity. | ||
Actual malice for false light requires believeability. | ||
There was no identification. |
QUESTION 5
- John published on his blog that Jack was donating money to a local children's shelter. Jack wanted to sue John because John's blog post was not true. What can Jack sue for?
libel | ||
false light | ||
libel and false light |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started