QUESTION $1$

Which of the following is NOT a justification offered by Mill in his defense of free speech?

A$.$ We shouldn't censor people because there is no real truth, and so everyone's opinion is equally reasonable. Censoring some and not others would therefore just be arbitrary.

B$.$ We shouldn't censor people because even if we think what they're saying is wrong, there's a possibility that their view could actually turn out to be true.

c$.$ We shouldn't censor people because it's unlikely that anyone's view is totally true, or totally false. There may be some kernel of truth in a mostly false view, and there may be some element of falsity in a mostly true view. We need to allow all of these views to be expressed openly so that we have the chance to discover the whole truth.

D$.$ We shouldn't censor people because even if we're sure that we know the correct view, we will only hold this view as a "prejudice" if we never subject it to scrutiny, or never allow it to be challenged by opposing views. We'll have a better grasp of the truth, or of what's reasonable, when we allow those true or reasonable views to "clash" with those that are false or unreasonable.