Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Question 11 An engineering technologist working on a construction project might be deemed to have a duty of care to a number of parties in
Question 11 An engineering technologist working on a construction project might be deemed to have a duty of care to a number of parties in the event of a structure failure. Which one of the following would probably NOT be owed a duty of care? Members of the public injured in the structure's failure. Employees at the site who are injured. The contractor The municipality in which the site is located. Question 12 Andrew throws a baseball toward Barry, with whom he is playing catch. Andrew's aim is bad and his ball hits Cassandra. who is walking nearby. Andrew has not committed battery against Cassandra because the contact he intended to make with Barry was not tom'ous because Barry consented to it. Andrew has committed battery against Cassandra because he intended to throw the ball. which hit her. Andrew has committed battery towards Cassandra because his intention to hit Barry with the ball is transferred to Cassandra. Andrew has not committed battery against Cassandra because he did not intend to harm her. Question 13 Appeals to the Supreme Court of Canada can be made from decisions of the following: Tax Court of Canada Provincial Courts of Appeal All of the choices Provincial Superior Courts Question 14 Theft over $5,000 is? an indictable offence a summary conviction offence a felony a hybrid offence Question 15 In the event there is foreseeable risk of injuryfrom an activity, a person must: Seek guidance from an expert in the eld before proceeding Only proceed if the risk of harm is small If the risk is major, take reasonable care to avoid that harm Advise the client before proceeding Question 16 A legal obligation to exercise caution when certain types of conduct carry the risk of harm to others: Strict liability Risk management Duty of care Standard of care Question 17 Sally and Nomi have been keeping a wolf in their backyard. They found it in the woods years ago and decided to take it home and raise it. Sally and Norm were very careful to keep the wolf within their strong fence, but it managed to escape anyway and bit a child. Are Sally and Norm liable? No, because the neighbours knew about the wolf and did not inform the police. No, because they took all possible precautions to prevent the wolf escaping Yes. because they didn't comply with the municipal byalaw Yes. because of strict liability
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started