Question 1(3 points) Why is it that public figures find it difficult to successfully sue a publication for libel, whereas private persons have a better chance Should public figures be required to accept libelous accusations as the price of fame Question 2(1 point) Defamation Goldman, an ex convict, was employed in the accounting department of Rogers Products Incorporated None of his coworkers was aware of his previous conviction and imprisonment, although the president of the firm and Ruiz, the human resources manager, knew of it During an office party, Goldman and Ruiz became involved in an argument and Ruiz shouted, You're an ex con and a jailbird We'd be better off without you here a Would Goldman have a basis for a suit for libel b Would Goldman have a basis for slander c Did Ruiz violate the professional ethics of his position Please enter three separate answers for each question (for example Yes, Yes, Yes) Question 1 options Question 3(2 points) Negligence The Sock 'n' Rock Music Store was located in a small shopping mall In an effort to attract additional customers, the manager of the store installed an outdoor loudspeaker and played rock music at high volume Nearby stores in the shopping mall objected, claiming that the loud music drove their customers away a Does Sock 'n' Rock have the right to use the rented property as it pleases b Do the other stores in the mall have a basis for suit, charging private or public nuisance c Do the other stores in the mall have a basis for suit, charging conversion d Would a court order preventing the loud music seem to be a good remedy Question 2 options Question 4(2 points) Negligence Leffingwell engaged the Bartwell Tree Removal Service to cut down and remove a diseased tree from her property When the work began, it was a calm day As the work progressed, however, a high wind arose and blew a portion of the tree onto a neighbor's car, causing considerable damage The neighbor brought suit against Bartwell, charging negligence a Does it seem likely that the accident could have been prevented b Could the owner of the car be charged with negligence for parking his car in a place where it could be damaged by the falling tree c Would the neighbor have a sound basis upon which to sue for damages d Do the circumstances seem to support a defense Bartwell might make claiming that this was an unavoidable accident Question 5(4 points) Directions Read the case below Answer the two questions Rensch left two diamond rings for cleaning at Riddle's Mall in Rapid City, South Dakota Riddle's had advertised free ring cleaning to the public When Rensch returned for the rings, he found that a clerk had mistakenly given them to another customer They were never recovered, and Rensch ultimately sued Riddle What tort was involved in this case, and is it likely that the court will find for Rensch Rensch v Riddle's Diamonds of Rapid City , 393 N W 2d 269 S D (South Dakota) What Principle of Law is violated in this case What should the final Decision be Question 1 options Question 6(4 points) Directions Read the case below Answer the two questions Robin Williams, famous entertainer and comedian, gave a performance at a San Francisco nightclub, The Great American Music Hall As part of his comedy routine, he disparaged a particular brand of wine, Rege, by suggesting that it would be a great success if it were directed toward a particular minority group The discussion of the wine also included certain obscene and vulgar expressions It seemed that the Rege wine was the target of Williams's jokes Video and audiotapes were made of the performance and were distributed by the recording company, Polygram Records Rege brought suit, claiming trade libel What would be the probable outcome of this suit Did the fact that the alleged libel took place during a comedy routine alter the case Polygram Records v Superior Court , 170 Cal App 3d 543 (California) What Principle of Law is violated What decision should be made

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Jun 21, 2024

Question 1(3 points) Why is it that public figures find it difficult to successfully sue a publication for libel, whereas private persons have a better

Question 1(3 points)

Why is it that public figures find it difficult to successfully sue a publication for libel, whereas private persons have a better chance? Should public figures be required to accept libelous accusations as the price of fame?

Question 2(1 point)

Defamation:Goldman, an ex-convict, was employed in the accounting department of Rogers Products Incorporated. None of his coworkers was aware of his previous conviction and imprisonment, although the president of the firm and Ruiz, the human resources manager, knew of it. During an office party, Goldman and Ruiz became involved in an argument and Ruiz shouted, "You're an ex-con and a jailbird. We'd be better off without you here."

a.Would Goldman have a basis for a suit for libel?
b.Would Goldman have a basis for slander?
c.Did Ruiz violate the professional ethics of his position?

Please enter three separate answers for each question (for example...Yes, Yes, Yes).

Question 1 options:

Question 3(2 points)

Negligence:The Sock 'n' Rock Music Store was located in a small shopping mall. In an effort to attract additional customers, the manager of the store installed an outdoor loudspeaker and played rock music at high volume. Nearby stores in the shopping mall objected, claiming that the loud music drove their customers away.

a.Does Sock 'n' Rock have the right to use the rented property as it pleases?
b.Do the other stores in the mall have a basis for suit, charging private or public nuisance?
c.Do the other stores in the mall have a basis for suit, charging conversion?
d.Would a court order preventing the loud music seem to be a good remedy?

Question 2 options:

Question 4(2 points)

Negligence:Leffingwell engaged the Bartwell Tree Removal Service to cut down and remove a diseased tree from her property. When the work began, it was a calm day. As the work progressed, however, a high wind arose and blew a portion of the tree onto a neighbor's car, causing considerable damage. The neighbor brought suit against Bartwell, charging negligence.

a.Does it seem likely that the accident could have been prevented?
b.Could the owner of the car be charged with negligence for parking his car in a place where it could be damaged by the falling tree?
c.Would the neighbor have a sound basis upon which to sue for damages?
d.Do the circumstances seem to support a defense Bartwell might make claiming that this was an unavoidable accident?

Question 5(4 points)

Directions:Read the case below.Answer the two questions.

Rensch left two diamond rings for cleaning at Riddle's Mall in Rapid City, South Dakota. Riddle's had advertised free ring cleaning to the public. When Rensch returned for the rings, he found that a clerk had mistakenly given them to another customer. They were never recovered, and Rensch ultimately sued Riddle. What tort was involved in this case, and is it likely that the court will find for Rensch? [Rensch v. Riddle's Diamonds of Rapid City, 393 N.W.2d 269 S.D. (South Dakota)]

What Principle of Law is violated in this case?

What should the final Decision be?

Question 1 options:

Question 6(4 points)

Directions:Read the case below.Answer the two questions.

Robin Williams, famous entertainer and comedian, gave a performance at a San Francisco nightclub, The Great American Music Hall. As part of his comedy routine, he disparaged a particular brand of wine, Rege, by suggesting that it would be a great success if it were directed toward a particular minority group. The discussion of the wine also included certain obscene and vulgar expressions. It seemed that the Rege wine was the target of Williams's jokes. Video and audiotapes were made of the performance and were distributed by the recording company, Polygram Records. Rege brought suit, claiming trade libel. What would be the probable outcome of this suit? Did the fact that the alleged libel took place during a comedy routine alter the case? [Polygram Records v. Superior Court, 170 Cal. App. 3d 543 (California)]

What Principle of Law is violated?

What decision should be made?