Question 14 (6 points) Listen A company has been found liable to a plaintiff or group of plaintiffs for intentionally lying about the health risks associated with its products. The jury is asked to award punitive, as well as compensatory, damages. (Remember that in the Liebek case, the jury initially awarded the plaintiff a sum based upon two days of the defendant's coffee sales. Objectively, that doesn't sound like a burden for the defendant.) What do you think legal policy should be with respect to punitive damages in this kind of situation? What is the current standard for awarding punitive damages? Do you believe that should change? Why